Uncategorized

Closer than a Brother

By Lavender August 14, 2008

Categories: Uncategorized

Tags:

An ongoing hot-button issue is the treatment of lab animals used in research, particularly chimpanzees and the other great apes—and specifically, should the latter have certain human legal rights?

Hiasl, a young chimpanzee smuggled out of Sierra Leone, was destined for an Austrian vivisection lab. Customs seized him, however, and he was sent to an animal sanctuary. That facility has gone bankrupt, so Hiasl, now 26, may yet end up in a lab, unless he can have a legal guardian appointed to administer funds donated for his upkeep. But, some say, only humans have the right to legal guardians; others, like primatologist Jane Goodall, have come to Hiasl’s defense.

Prorights arguments are weighed heavily with references to the ability of animals to communicate with us in various ways and to pass the self-awareness mirror test to demonstrates that sense, as well as their sharing 98 percent of our DNA.

As to DNA, even the reef-building coral Acropora millepora’s DNA contains genetic sequences corresponding to genes that pattern of the human nervous system, and mice share some 97.5 percent of their working DNA with us. Parrots talk; chimps can’t; dolphins and whales are communicators; elephants mourn and remember their fellows. What are their rights?

The British ceased using great apes in medical research, while the National Science Foundation (NSF) recommends that surplus chimps not be killed (as unneeded lab animals routinely are).

Any lab animal experimentation arouses the ire of animal activists, who, in turn, arrogate to themselves the right to torch the homes of, or kill, researchers and their families.

Some studies that sound ludicrous or abhorrent have specific rationales.

One study of the “sex life of bugs” was, in fact, isolating juvenile hormone to prevent the insect’s maturation, which had important implications for increased crop yields in Third World countries.

In 1937, it was discovered that the antibacterial sulfanilamide, highly successful in powders and pills, would dissolve in ethylene glycol. The liquid medication was not tested on animals, and by the time the elixir was discovered to be toxic, more than 100 people had died.

The thinking that allows our mistreatment of creatures boils down to: “I am human; that thing is not.” The closer to home, the narrower the definition of “human” must become to allow whites killing whites in Northern Ireland, blacks massacring blacks in Rwanda, and so on.

While the courts discuss the rights of Hiasl and other primates, we might do well to decide exactly what we owe all living creatures in terms of respect, along with the right not to be slaughtered needlessly, tortured, or driven out of their habitats.

A semantic start to considering ethical treatment of the greater apes—including mankind—might be to replace the phrase “dominion over” with “stewardship of.”

Be Sociable, Share!

One Response to Closer than a Brother

  1. E.B. Boatner’s editorial (“Closer than a Brother,” Lavender, August 15) states that animal activists claim they have the right to kill researchers and their families. I don’t know where Mr. Boatner got his information, but inaccurate generalizations like this do a disservice to your readers and to legitimate animal rights organizations. The Animal Rights Coalition, your friendly local animal rights group right here in the Twin Cities, has been advocating for animals in Minnesota for over two decades. We have a published policy on non-violence which states, “ARC dedicates itself to a violence-free society for all animals, both human and non-human , , . . We seek to eliminate violence and suffering in the world, not to contribute to it.”

    So please, Mr. Boatner, try to refrain from painting large groups of people with a broad brush. Just as the GLBT community has many types of activists and many forms of activism, so too does any other social justice movement. ARC has had a booth at the Pride Festival for many years, and I would hate for people to think they need to don flak jackets before picking up one of our popular “Vegetarians Taste Better” buttons or stopping by to get some water for their overly hot and tired dogs.

Links to this post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!